From Access to Agency: What Is Community Ownership in Conservation? - SOS – Sumatran Orangutan Society

From Access to Agency: What Is Community Ownership in Conservation?

Our strategy is built on the premise that local communities – those who live closest to and depend most on forest resources – must be the ones to lead its protection. But what does this look like in practice? How does community-centred conservation differ from community-based conservation?

Access to Agency: An Important Difference

Imagine you live on the edge of a rainforest. For generations, this land has provided your family’s livelihood, wellbeing and identity. One day, you are told the forest is now a protected area for wildlife, and you can no longer use the land. Overnight, your reality and the future of your family has changed.

In this traditional conservation model, you are excluded from ancestral lands, with no alternative way to earn a living. You might be allowed limited access to natural resources under strict rules. But you don’t have a seat at the table: decisions about your home are made by government agencies and Conservation NGOs. 

Over time, with no legal rights and no way to dispute these changes, resentment builds. In order to support your family, you may be forced to encroach on the land that you once owned, risking harsh penalties. In this system, conservation feels like a threat, not a partnership.

This is the daily reality for many communities living alongside orangutan habitats. But it’s not the only way to do conservation.

What is Social Forestry?

Indonesia has emerged as a global leader in addressing such conflicts by championing its innovative Social Forestry schemes. This provides an opportunity for SOS and its partners to promote a rights-based model, whereby the community holds the legal rights to their land. They are the primary decision-makers, with authentic ownership.

Instead of being told what they can or can’t do, communities are supported to build forest-friendly livelihoods and have full agency to decide how the land is managed.

Conservation is no longer imposed upon them, but becomes something they are part of. By restoring agency to these communities, we ensure that the protection of the rainforest is rooted in pride, identity and long-term prosperity.

However, the process isn’t always simple. Land boundaries often overlap and the legal process is long and exhausting. That’s where we and our partners come in. Together, we advocate for the formal, legal recognition of customary land rights, support communities in designing sustainable land-use plans, and deepen expertise in forest management to ensure long-term resilience and success.

Scaling Impact in Partnership With Communities

Historically, “community-based” conservation has meant little more than communities being granted access to resources or being asked to join projects designed by outsiders. At SOS, we believe that this isn’t enough. Our programmes move beyond participation and embrace authentic community ownership.

In Sumatra, many communities hold deep historical and customary ties to their land. When these rights are legally recognised, it changes everything. The community transforms from bystanders into forest guardians. However, the move toward agency requires more than just legal status; it requires economic viability.

This is where Result-Based Payments (RBP) serve as a transformative alternative livelihood.

True custodians of the land—the families who patrol the borders and monitor the biodiversity—need to receive direct payments for the environmental services they provide. By rewarding the measurable success of forest protection, we ensure that the “guardians” are not just surviving, but thriving. These payments validate their role as essential service providers to the planet, making forest protection more lucrative than its destruction.

The Benefits of Community-Centred Conservation

When communities own and manage their natural resources, everyone benefits.

  • Local people are no longer in conflict with conservation, instead they become the forest’s strongest allies.
  • Communities have a wealth of traditional knowledge that is invaluable for conservation. Data-driven conservation methods can exist in harmony with traditional knowledge. This partnership results in better conservation outcomes.
  • Secure land tenure and management rights allow communities to develop sustainable land-use plans, improving their wellbeing and livelihoods.

How To Tell the Difference

It can be difficult to know whether conservation programmes are community-based or community-centred. But there are some key differences:

  • Rights: Do communities have long-term, legal rights to the land?
  • Autonomy: Do communities decide which species to plant, how and when to harvest, and how the land is managed?
  • Equity: Do the economic and social rewards of conservation flow directly back into the community?

Why This Matters

We know that authentic community ownership in conservation is the only way to secure long-term conservation success. Simply put, we cannot protect orangutans at the expense of people. To secure a resilient future for Sumatra’s rainforests, we must find solutions that allow both nature and people to thrive. Join us in building that future.

An adult sumatran orangutan

Get SOS email updates

You can help protect Sumatra's Orangutans. Click to get updates

Donate Subscribe